Monday, 28 May 2007


CHEENI KUM


Sugar-free Sarcasm


Keep the sweeteners low. Low fat, high sarcasm. No mush. No overt display of emotions. Rather put in some tingly humour. And spin the story around some ironical situations. The recipe of ‘Cheeni Kum’ is ready.

The movie, featuring Amitabh Bachchan in yet another brilliant performance, not just entertains you with its sarcastic humour, it also touches your heart with its emotional moments. The film has no pretension of being a laugh riot. It charts a narrow course by telling a bittersweet tale of romance between a 64-year-old man and a 34 year-old woman.

Buddhadev (Amitabh Bachchan) is the chef of what he calls “the best Indian restaurant in London”. He takes pride in his job and considers cooking more of an art than a culinary chore. The cooks under him dread him for his perfectionist streak.

Buddhadev’s reputation is challenged when a customer disapproves of the restaurant’s Hyderabadi Zafrani Pulao. The customer is Neena (Tabu), a tourist from India.

The acidic chef talks tough with Neena and she walks out of the restaurant. Later, she makes Buddhadev realize the mistake of the cook who had made the pulao.

Buddhadev feels an apology to Neena is due. But the ego in him won’t let him say “I’m Sorry”.

What begins as a bittersweet acquaintance between Buddhadev and Neena soon transforms into mutual attraction.

At home, Buddhadev has a ninety-year-old mother (Zohra Sehgal) who keeps asking him to join a gym. In his neighborhood lives a sweet little girl Sexy (Swini Khara), who suffers from blood cancer and is Buddhadev’s best friend.

The irony in ‘Cheeni Kum’ is that the high points of the romantic track of Buddhadev and Neena are matched with the tragic turns in the track featuring Sexy.

Paresh Rawal plays Neena’s 58-year-old diabetic father who is unwilling to accept a man as old as Buddhadev as Neena’s suitor.

Director R Balakrishnan has made a very feelgood movie. Balki keeps Amitabh Bachchan the driving force of the story. He keeps sentimentality out. The humour he opts for is tinged with sarcasm and rustiness. But behind the barbs, love is visible.

Amitabh Bachchan is touching a new height of charisma at his age. Not only does he look fabulous, he delivers a breezy, buoyant and convincing performance as the caustic chef.

Tabu comes up with a fine act but her Hyderabadi accent is unmistakable in her dialogues. Paresh Rawal is certainly not at his near best. But that is not his fault. His role has been written in such a way that if offers very little scope for comedy.

Child artist Swini Khara is simply brilliant. Her role and her dialogues have been written very beautifully. Zohra Sehgal is delightful in a performance incredibly feisty for her age.

‘Cheeni Kum’ has different versions of the title song that play in the background in various situations. The movie’s highpoint is its end when the protagonist wins the hand of his woman but loses someone else very close to him.

Director R Balki has got almost everything right in his first feature film.

Do not miss this sugarfree spread.


(Naresh Kumar Deoshi, Film critic, ApunKaChoice.Com)

Sunday, 27 May 2007

PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: AT WORLD'S END


NYTIMES REVIEW

Back to the Bounding Main

“The immaterial has become material,” announces the East India Company’s scheming Lord Beckett (Tom Hollander) early in “Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End.” He could be referring to the recent resurrection of the pirate Barbossa (Geoffrey Rush), flush with life and his expanded role in the trilogy. Or he could be speaking of his newfound dominion over the Flying Dutchman and its squid-faced captain, Davy Jones (Bill Nighy), whose excavated heart is now in Beckett’s possession.

More likely, though, the words are a subliminal reassurance from the director, Gore Verbinski. After the bloated shenanigans of the previous entry, “Dead Man’s Chest” — perhaps the only pirate movie to see the need for a Ferris wheel — Mr. Verbinski is reminding us why we should ever trust him again

(Full Review)

(JEANNETTE CATSOULIS for NYTIMES)


WASHINGTON POST REVIEW

The saga of Captain Jack Sparrow comes to an end (or does it?) in this third installment of the Disney action franchise

Funner, biggerer, brighterer, bolderer, "Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End" is not only okay, it may even be close to good. A lavish spectacle illuminated by Johnny Depp's swishing pirate captain, the movie has its dull moments, but not many.

Our hero from films one and two, Capt. Jack Sparrow (Depp), is dead. Not to worry. This is a movie based, after all, on a theme park ride, not a story, so there are no rules and no reason why he can't be fetched from the grim land he now inhabits.

(Full Review)

(Stephen Hunter for WASHINGTON POST)


HOLLYWOOD REPORTER REVIEW

Avast -- as in a vast improvement over the soggy previous installment

For what it's worth, the trilogy-capping "Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End," represents a considerable step up from the soulless "Dead Man's Chest."

Johnny Depp's Captain Jack Sparrow's in fine flighty form and the enterprise as a whole has reconnected with some of that fun stuff that made it such a pleasant excursion when it first set sail back in 2003.

(Full Review)

(MICHAEL RECHTSHAFFEN for HOLLYWOOD REPORTER)


VARIETY REVIEW

The third voyage in the "Pirates" trilogy could be touted as "the biggest, loudest and second-best (or second-worst) 'Pirates' ever!" -- not necessarily a ringing endorsement, but honest. "Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End" clocks in at more than 2¾ hours, but, unlike last year's bloated sequel, at least possesses some semblance of a destination, making it slightly more coherent -- if no less numbing during the protracted finale. A bountiful opening is assured. The running time could diminish this swashbuckler's staying power, but Disney would likely leap at "Pirates IV" in a heartbeat if the principals would enlist for another tour at sea.

(Full Review)

(BRIAN LOWRY for VARIETY)


USA TODAY REVIEW

'Pirates' goes down with the ship

The pirate ship has hit foul waters, and even the sharp wit and charm of everyone's favorite buccaneer can't save it.

One longs for more scenes featuring Captain Jack Sparrow, Johnny Depp's indelible and beloved character in Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End (* 1/2 out of four), and less of everything else in this bloated, overwrought and convoluted three-hour misfire.

(Full Review)

(Claudia Puig for USA TODAY)


ROLLING STONE REVIEW

The good news first: Keith Richards totally rocks it playing pirate daddy to Johnny Depp's Capt. Jack Sparrow. The deep rumble of his voice and those hooded eyes that narrowly open like the creaky gates of hell make him what the rest of this three-peat is not: authentically scary. It's fun to see Richards swagger, even sitting down. Watch him stage a macabre reunion for Jack and his dear old mum. Don't worry, I won't reveal her secret.

(Full Review)

(Peter Travers for ROLLING STONE)


LOS ANGELES TIMES REVIEW

Third 'Pirates' long on spectacle, short on sense

The third 'Pirates of the Caribbean' has plenty of . . . It's possible that someone, somewhere, has put together a flowchart or diagram tracking the many plots, subplots, digressions, divagations and flights of whimsy in "Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End," which, depending on your tolerance for Byzantine complication for complication's sake, might have been alternately titled "At Wit's End."

The third in a series that appears to be hinting at immortality in more ways than one, "Pirates 3" demands intimate knowledge of the first two installments, not to mention a sterling memory and attention span. In other words, it pays to be prepared. Seriously, this thing is a stern master — walk in casually off the street and you risk nearly three hours of very high-octane confusion.

(Full Review)

(Carina Chocano for LA TIMES)


SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE REVIEW

'Pirates' takes on a lot of water in its 3rd voyage. Not even Keith Richards can keep this dud afloat

The competition is enormous, but with "Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End," a case could be made for "Pirates" as the worst film series since Thomas Edison got the wacky idea that pictures could move. "Hellraiser," the previous titleholder, looked as though it might hold onto its crown, thanks to its disgusting effects. But the makers of "Pirates" cleverly diminished that advantage with gross undead seamen and lots of rotting teeth. And now it overtakes "Hellraiser" through sheer length and by a novel new effect: The story is so convoluted and impenetrable, so impossible to grasp hold of, that viewers sit there wondering if they've had a stroke.

(Full Review)

(Mick LaSalle for SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE)